But Ellen Degeneres Signed a Contract! So What?
When I was in law school, one of the things that we discussed in my first year civil procedure class was the various ways that a defendant could respond to a complaint. The "so what?" defense is properly referred to as a demurrer. To wit, assuming, arguendo, that Ellen and/or Portia breached the contract that they entered into with Mutts and Moms, did that give Mutts and Moms the legal right to seize the dog Iggy the way that they did?
Let's take it one step further. To wit, assuming, arguendo, that Mutts and Moms had the legal right to seize Iggy the way that they did, were they morally justified in doing so? This is the crux of the matter, and this is why dog lovers everywhere are howling for their blood, some figuratively and some quite literally. To wit, Ellen had found a loving home for Iggy, but that home wasn't good enough for the sanctimonious control freaks at Mutts and Moms.
Contrary to what most laypersons seem to think, contracts are seldom as straightforward as they seem. To wit, at the core of all contracts is an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Simply put, you can't be held legally to the terms of an unconscionable contract. In theory at least, courts are supposed to void such contracts rather than enforce them or fashion some sort of compromise that is fair and just. As I stated in a previous blog post, should it come to legal action, I think Mutts and Moms will be hard-pressed to justify their actions.