<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:57:59 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>Internet Esquire</title><description>&lt;B&gt;Research and Consulting&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR&gt;| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;A href="http://www.netesq.com/"&gt;http://www.netesq.com/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;A href="http://www.netesq.com/about.html"&gt;About&lt;/A&gt; -
&lt;A Href="http://www.netesq.com/faqs.html"&gt;FAQs&lt;/a&gt; -
&lt;A Href="http://www.netesq.com/links.html"&gt;Links&lt;/a&gt; -
&lt;A Href="http://www.netesq.com/contact.html"&gt;Contact&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://blog.netesq.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>90</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-822997115263193667</guid><pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:49:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-03-20T19:57:59.771-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>law school</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>king hall</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>financial aid</category><title>Considering King Hall?</title><atom:summary type='text'>While in Los Angeles on other business recently, I glanced at an e-mail that I had received from my Alma mater UC Davis Law School (King Hall), and I noticed that the law firm of Alston &amp; Bird was hosting a reception for King Hall alumni and admitted students on Monday evening March 15th, 2010.  I RSVP'd at the last minute on Friday afternoon March 12th, then found my way to the aforementioned </atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2010/03/considering-king-hall.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-3301170159625663828</guid><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-16T15:43:10.295-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>censorship</category><title>A Response from the Ignorant Twits at A&amp;E's Message Boards</title><atom:summary type='text'>After posting my previous blog entry entitled Arbitrary and Capricious Censorship at A&amp;E's Message Boards, I posted a comment in the same thread where one of my comments was deleted and directed the powers that be at A&amp;E TV to my previous blog entry.  Astonishingly, one of the ignorant twits at A&amp;E TV with the alias "aetv_dlg" responded in that same thread:I saw the removed post. You started it </atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2010/01/response-from-ignorant-twits-at-message.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-6522376644970615485</guid><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:06:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-15T17:29:50.471-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>hoarders</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>censorship</category><title>Arbitrary and Capricious Censorship at A&amp;E’s Message Boards</title><atom:summary type='text'>On or about January 14th, 2010, I posted the following message on the A&amp;E Message Board covering its Hoarders show in a thread entitled “Horders[sic] OR LAZY??? I KNOW- LAZY LAZY LAZY”:It's Astonishing How Some People Find It Necessary to Compare Themselves to HoardersI'm not sure why people find it necessary to say things like, "I work three full time jobs and still find time to cook for my </atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2010/01/arbitrary-and-capricious-censorship-at.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>6</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-6368282574715501738</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:36:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-14T15:41:31.270-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>hoarders</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>blaming the victim</category><title>The Ripple Effect of Hoarders</title><atom:summary type='text'>A&amp;E's show Hoarders  is an intervention-style reality television series that profiles people whose lives have been severely impacted by a hoarding compulsion.  My mother turned me on to this show; in turn, I've turned several friends on to it; in turn, these friends have turned several of their friends and family members on to it.  In sum, it is the most compelling and gripping reality television</atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2009/12/ripple-effect-of-hoarders.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-6964056073995835898</guid><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-12T01:00:12.519-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>jury nullification</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>mistrials</category><title>Jury Nullification Is a Moral Obligation</title><atom:summary type='text'>This is my latest post in a series of posts arising from my recent experiences with jury duty for the Los Angeles County Superior Court.  In this post, I cover the topic of jury nullification -- .i.e., the legal theory/reality that juries can and do ignore the law and rule the way they want.  Other things being equal, I believe in jury nullification, whereas many of the people who mention this </atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2009/10/jury-nullification-is-moral-obligation.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-356117141703067587</guid><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-09T10:25:26.548-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>jury duty</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>jury nullification</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>jury service</category><title>The Folly of Avoiding Jury Duty</title><atom:summary type='text'>As a followup to my earlier posts entitled Post Mortem on Jury Duty and Replacing Mandatory Jury Duty with Voluntary Jury Service, this post covers the trials, tribulations, and concerns of those who hope to avoid jury duty altogether.  The nature of this challenge has changed dramatically in California with the implementation of the One-Day or One-Trial [pdf] system of jury duty, so much so that</atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2009/10/folly-of-avoiding-jury-duty.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-2105163677765260897</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 03:46:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-09T10:04:30.177-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>jury duty</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>jury service</category><title>Replacing Mandatory Jury Duty with Voluntary Jury Service</title><atom:summary type='text'>I recently posted a blog entry entitled Post Mortem on Jury Duty in which I narrated my recent experiences pursuant to being summoned for jury duty by the Los Angeles County Superior Court.  In this followup post, I will consider the issue of whether mandatory jury duty should become voluntary jury service.  As a matter of course, I will cover the advantages of the One-Day or One-Trial [pdf] </atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2009/10/replacing-mandatory-jury-duty-with.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-8176114075431543191</guid><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 03:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-09T10:03:34.050-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>los angeles county superior court</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>jury duty</category><title>Post Mortem on Jury Duty</title><atom:summary type='text'>After years of being ignored by the courts in re jury duty, I recently received a summons to appear for said jury duty.  The date the court in question had set for me to call in/appear was very inconvenient, so I called in and rescheduled using the court's automated system.  Rather than postponing as long as possible, I picked the earliest date that I knew I could appear, as I never know where </atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2009/10/post-mortem-on-jury-duty.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-6495364516440148775</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 02:24:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-11-02T19:03:18.609-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>causes of death</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>iatrogenesis</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>cancer</category><title>Death by Medicine</title><atom:summary type='text'>By virtue of my longstanding interest in rejuvenation research, I recently revisited Ben Best’s online research on various causes of death, and I realized that I had neglected iatrogenic causes of death as the most serious mortality risk that most people face in the United States today.  To wit, according to very reliable sources, at least a million people in the United States die every year </atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2008/11/death-by-medicine.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-1120629216624284244</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:27:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-04-13T23:32:07.800-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>childfree</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>autism</category><title>The Mystery of Autism</title><atom:summary type='text'>The United Nations designated April 2, 2008 as the first Worldwide Autism Awareness Day, and after being bombarded by a series of totally uninformative television reports that began the day before and lasted well into the day after, I was intrigued enough to bring myself back up to speed on the topic.Even though I've tutored autistic children in the past, I've never been able to get a </atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2008/04/mystery-of-autism.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>3</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-1867558175245594508</guid><pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-12-03T19:46:02.315-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>rejuvenation research</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>telomerase</category><title>Telomerase Activation Redux</title><atom:summary type='text'>Founder of T.A. Sciences Noel Thomas Patton  read my recent blog post entitled Ending Old Age through Telomerase Activation, and called me on the phone to offer his feedback.  Specifically, he made a point of questioning the accuracy of my claim that "there are many cell types in the human body that never stop reproducing," and he was right to do so.  The only healthy cells in the human body that</atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2007/11/telomerase-activation-redux.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-3697626371279946792</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 08:08:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-11-23T00:13:16.834-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>astragalus</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>senescence</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>telomerase</category><title>Ending Old Age through Telomerase Activation</title><atom:summary type='text'>When I took my first college level course in physical anthropology, I took it upon myself to research the emerging body of scientific knowledge regarding the biological process known as senescence.  Simply put, many (but not all) biological organisms grow to maturity, then attempt to maintain vitality, but eventually succumb to the ravages of old age and die.  The process through which such </atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2007/11/ending-old-age-through-telomerase.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>3</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-530728786444390166</guid><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-11-12T12:29:23.082-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>heuristics</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>artificial intelligence</category><title>Being Too Smart for Your Own Good</title><atom:summary type='text'>While exploring the website of the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence, I was guided to an essay by Eliezer Yudkowsy entitled Cognitive biases potentially affecting judgment of global risks.  [PDF document].  I experienced several "A-ha!" moments while reading the essay, all of which synchronized with my inherent skepticism of supposed expertise.  And at the risk of sounding like I </atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2007/11/being-too-smart-for-your-own-good.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-4304893831943837637</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-03-21T14:43:14.785-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>ellen</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>animal rescue</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>mutts and moms</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>iggy</category><title>Mutts and Moms: The Rest of the Story</title><atom:summary type='text'>While I believe that the Iggy news cycle finished out this last Sunday night, I feel compelled to post the following information that I found posted on the website for Ellen Degeneres' talk show:When Worlds Collide In the world of rescuers, companion animals are no different than children. They need our protection as they cannot survive on their own. They need our advocacy, as they cannot speak </atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2007/10/mutts-and-moms-rest-of-story.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>6</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-1779043864989036515</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-10-23T08:27:51.961-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>ellen</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>pet rescue</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>judy crozier</category><title>Ellen to Feature Pet Rescue on Monday October 22, 2007</title><atom:summary type='text'>[Added:  Make that Tuesday October 23rd.  The press release apparently confused the air date with the taping date.]While following up on the controversy involving Ellen Degeneres and Mutts and Moms, I stumbled upon a press release at PR Web Owner Saved by Dog to be on The Ellen DeGeneres Show.  I immediately submitted the press release to Digg, but (much to my surprise) the Digg item has yet to </atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2007/10/ellen-to-feature-pet-rescue-on-monday.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-6238915584207654104</guid><pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-03-21T14:37:01.697-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>ellen</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>pet rescue</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>mutts and moms</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Linda Milazzo</category><title>Linda Milazzo on the Ellen Degeneres/Mutts and Moms Controversy</title><atom:summary type='text'>While checking recent news reports on the Ellen Degeneres/Mutts and Moms controversy, I found a link to Linda Milazzo's Smirking Chimp Blog entitled Ellen DeGeneres' Misuse of Media and A Challenge To Right That Wrong.  I highly recommend this post for the quality of its factual content, obtained from direct contact with many of the people involved in this controversy, but I respectfully disagree</atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2007/10/linda-milazzo-on-ellen-degeneresmutts.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>11</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-6267187891309932943</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-10-19T12:14:02.618-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>ellen</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>mutts and moms</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>animal rights</category><title>Putting the Mutts and Moms Controversy into Perspective</title><atom:summary type='text'>Over the last week or so, I've injected myself into the Mutts and Moms controversy, stating unequivocally that the Mutts and Moms dog rescue group should not have removed the dog Iggy from the loving home where Ellen Degeneres placed it, and that they should return Iggy to that home sooner rather than later.  The vast majority of people who have expressed an opinion on this topic agree with me --</atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2007/10/putting-mutts-and-moms-controversy-into.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-194356609879822241</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-10-18T14:45:53.881-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>ellen</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>mutts and moms</category><title>Laura Sweet on Mutts and Moms</title><atom:summary type='text'>It never ceases to amaze me how quick people are to throw down the guantlet with me rather than engage in rational discourse.  To wit, one Laura Sweet responded to two of my recent carefully considered posts regarding Mutts and Moms with a tone that is anything but civil:"This controversy is fueled by people who have no idea what it's like to place dogs in proper care and all that is considered </atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2007/10/laura-sweet-on-mutts-and-moms.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>6</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-414254225610063300</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-10-18T08:56:11.849-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>ellen</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>mutts and moms</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>contract law</category><title>But Ellen Degeneres Signed a Contract!  So What?</title><atom:summary type='text'>Apologists for Mutts and Moms are fond of pointing out that Ellen Degeneres signed a contract with Mutts and Moms that prohibited Ellen from placing Iggy (the dog that Ellen adopted) with a new home.  Of course, Ellen never signed that contract, but since her partner Portia de Rossi did, I'm willing to ignore that particular fine brush stroke and discuss the big picture.  In other words, assuming</atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2007/10/but-ellen-degeneres-signed-contract-so.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-2564742709700338849</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-03-21T10:24:37.190-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>ellen</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>mutts and moms</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>iggy</category><title>Mutts and Moms Under Fire</title><atom:summary type='text'>On Tuesday October 16th, 2007, Ellen Degeneres made a tearful plea on her television show for the return of a dog named Iggy that was seized by the operators of a local Pasadena dog rescue after Ellen had given it away to a new family.  Ellen had adopted Iggy through the rescue, and found the dog a new home a few weeks later after determining that the dog was not compatible with her existing </atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2007/10/mutts-and-moms-under-fire.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>19</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-2665859867191290266</guid><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 00:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-07-14T17:50:08.024-07:00</atom:updated><title>Where to Turn for Help</title><atom:summary type='text'>Back in November of 2004, I posted a blog entry entitled Why Does God Let Good People Suffer?  On July 14th, 2007, this post got its fourth comment, the second one being one that I posted to provide a live link to Attorney Robert Sutherland's Book of Job website, which was mentioned in the first comment, an anonymous one.  The last two comments were also anonymous, and they appeared to be made by</atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2007/07/where-to-turn-for-help.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-117358906819964973</guid><pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 06:27:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-03-14T00:44:56.893-07:00</atom:updated><title>Vice President Bill Clinton?</title><atom:summary type='text'>News commentators have been speculating about the possibility of former President Bill Clinton becoming the "First Gentleman" (First Spouse, maybe?) if and when Senator Hillary Clinton is elected President of the United States in November of 2008.  That got me to thinking:  Why not Vice President Bill Clinton in 2008?  Many people would vote for a wife and husband Clinton ticket, whereas Article </atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2007/03/vice-president-bill-clinton.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>5</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-116961456411062550</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 04:56:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-03-21T15:56:33.177-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>rejuvenation research</category><title>Health and Longevity Redux</title><atom:summary type='text'>In my most recent blog post prior to this one, I noted that Pharmexa was testing a possible cancer vaccine, referencing an earlier blog post of mine which asserted that the lengthening of telomeres on the ends of DNA strands would soon provide a cure for old age by rejuvenating old but healthy cells.  I remain intrigued by issues of health and longevity, and my blog posts will probably continue </atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2007/01/health-and-longevity-redux.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-115887710304982644</guid><pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 23:56:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-03-24T09:54:55.345-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>rejuvenation research</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>cancer</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>telomerase</category><title>Pharmexa Testing Posssible Universal Cancer Vaccine</title><atom:summary type='text'>In a previous blog post, I asserted that the lengthening of telomeres on the ends of DNA strands would soon provide a cure for old age by rejuvenating old but healthy cells.  This has already been accomplished in vitro using the enzyme telomerase, and clinical trials with humans will eventually get underway.  As such, all you have to do is stay alive and stay reasonably healthy until telomerase </atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2006/09/pharmexa-testing-posssible-universal.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9314417.post-115802227661993129</guid><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 00:46:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2006-09-11T17:52:40.750-07:00</atom:updated><title>United We Stand</title><atom:summary type='text'>September 11, 2006 finds me in Austin, Texas, the state capital.  As I sat in my hotel room last night, working through the night to prepare for a meeting with one of my clients at 7am, 9/11 documentaries were being broadcast on the History Channel, playing in the background, beguiling me away from the here and now, and taking me back in time to September 11, 2001.  I was in Sacramento at the </atom:summary><link>http://blog.netesq.com/2006/09/united-we-stand.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Internet Esquire)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>